Talk:HMS Cochrane (1905)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:23, 19 June 2010 (UTC) Overall this is a good article. I was surprised not to see it on WP:OMT though, but that's probably because an armored cruiser =/= battlecruiser. It does feel lacking in terms of information compared to others I've read, but I'll trust that's all the info there is. Anyway:[reply]

"However, the ship remained unengaged throughout the engagement," wording feels slightly redundant.
- Indeed it does and I've changed it.
To double check, is this all the info that can be found on the ship?
- Without going into archival data this is it. The armoured cruisers, along with the dreadnoughts, spent a very boring war patrolling the North Sea and training. Unfortunately I can't even tell when she was refitting so I can't confirm that she participated in several of the post-Jutland sorties by the Grand Fleet.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's the only issue I have. I'll put it on hold and ideally will be able to pass it tomorrow. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:23, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Issues are fixed so I'll pass the article. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]