Talk:HMS Cato (1782)

HMS Cato (1782) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 23, 2022. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Cato (1782) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Hound

@Acad Ronin: Hi, do you have another reference for Hound sailing on to Bombay? I don't think that Lloyd's mentions it. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:55, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pickersgill-Cunliffe: All I have are the LL items I added. The items have her leaving Madeira for the EI and have her arriving from Bombay, but there is none that has her arriving there. Winfield merely states that in October 1782 she sailed for the EI, and that she was broken up at Woolwich in 1784. Acad Ronin (talk) 21:05, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Acad Ronin: Ah, got it now. Thanks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Cato (1782)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 08:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this one in the next few days. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Design

both of which were anomalous types: suggest "both of which were anomalous types of ships"

Done

the navy ordered...: shouldn't navy be capitalised?

Reworded anyway

...twenty-nine of them, of which ten were of fifty guns.: not sure of the consistency of writing out numbers, particularly fifty, since "50-gun" is used earlier in the text.

Reworded

Construction

No issues

Disappearance

No issues, but I suggest having the main heading as Service, with Disappearance as a subheading for the paragraph starting "Having reached South America". I appreciate that this would be more of an editorial choice though, hence it is a suggestion only.

Done

other stuff

Sources look fine
Image tags OK
No dupe links

Only a few issues found, this looks to be in pretty good order otherwise. Placing on hold. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:38, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zawed: Hi, thanks for the review. Have replied above. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:58, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy with these changes, so am passing this as GA as I believe that it meets the necessary criteria. Zawed (talk) 08:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]