Talk:HMS Bellerophon (1907)

HMS Bellerophon (1907) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 21, 2017. (Reviewed version).

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Bellerophon (1907)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 09:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is in great shape. I only have a few quibbles:

the draught doesn't match between the body and infobox
the crew infobox upper limit isn't supported in the body
KC probably doesn't need the initialisation, as it isn't used again
the lower range on the bulkheads in the infobox doesn't seem to be supported by the body?
the upper range of deck armour in the infobox doesn't seem to match the body?
What is the relevance of On 10 March 1914, Temeraire was transferred to the 4th Battle Squadron (BS)? She hasn't been mentioned before. Also BS should probably be specified after its first usage with 1st BS.
- Stupid computer
Re: 17 and 20 July. Probably worth re-stating 1914, especially if the Temeraire reference above it is deleted
probably worth specifying that the High Sea Fleet was German
- There's a reference to the German raid earlier in the sentence, which should be enough of a link, I think.
Shetland Islands should be linked
St Vincent isn't linked and should be prefixed with ship type. Also, relevance.
- Even more stupid computer.
File:HMS Agincourt in the North Sea 1915.jpg isn't very likely to have been taken by a USN employee, RN far more likely.
- Could be, could also be by a naval attaché on a training exercise. No way to tell. But we had this discussion about the photo of the 1st BS on exercise already.

That's me done.

- Thanks for the catching all these nits.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]