Talk:Gimcheon Sangmu FC

Football Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 22:01, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sangju Sangmu Phoenix → Sangju Sangmu FC – It was renamed to 'Sangju Sangmu FC'. Korean Wikipedia's article was also renamed to Sangju Sangmu FC(상주 상무 축구단) because of same reason.[1] They are marking '상주 상무 프로축구단'(means Sangju Sangmu FC) at offical web site. Thanks. Min's (talk) 14:43, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 13:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sangju Sangmu Phoenix → Sangju Sangmu FC - Have to move Sangju Sangmu FC immedialtley, It don't need debate.Footwiks (talk) 05:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merge discussion for Gwangju Sangmu FC

An article that you have been involved in editing, Gwangju Sangmu FC , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Abcmaxx (talk) 18:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that Gwangju Sangmu FC be merged into Sangju Sangmu FC. The articles are almost identical, and Gwangju Sagmu is even a subheading of the Sangju FC history. Gwangju FC is not related to either and has a completely separate article.

Agree Gwangju Sangmu just changed the team's name to Sangju Sangmu. Not different team.z4617925 (talk) 14:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Gwangju Sangmu FC and Sangju Sangmu FC is officially different club by K League. Not the just change club name. Sangju Sangmu FC is founded on 2011. You can check out the official founding year at K League website.

http://www.kleague.com/kr/sub.asp?avan=1006010000&league_id=2&team_id=K23& Yes, of course, Two clubs has same root from Sangmu-Korea Armed Forces Athletic Corps. But K League's policy is Sangmu is just player provider. Gwangju and Sangju, two differenent cities are main club control body. So K League separate two clubs.Footwiks (talk) 08:12, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion So why are the talk pages merged and why are the articles almost identical? A separate legal entity does not necessarily deem a merger not valid, technically Sachsen Leipzig/BSG Chemie Leipzig is good example of convoluted history but enough causation to have one as opposed 3-4 separate articles every time the club reformed. Same goes for many reformed Italian clubs for example. Abcmaxx (talk) 14:03, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Actually, I opposed in 2014. But I watched Gwangju Sangmu and Sangu Sangmu articles for two years. As I mentioned, Although These club had same root, Offcially, two clubs are different each club by K League policy. But articles are almost same and there isn't effectiveness of keeping two independent.Footwiks (talk) 11:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 December 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 22:13, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sangju Sangmu FC → Gimcheon Sangmu FC

Officialy, relocated to Gimcheon and renamed to Gimcheon Sangmu FC.

Refer to Newspaper article Footwiks (talk) 09:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 12:32, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I am unsure whether to nominator is proposing to move the page to Gimcheon Sangju Sangmu FC or Gimcheon Sangmu FC? GiantSnowman 12:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I made a mistake. we have to move the page to Gimcheon Sangmu FC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Footwiks (talk • contribs) 12:42, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Giant Snowman 12:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Gimcheon Sangmu FC logo.svg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]