This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
A fact from Guy Thwaites appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 February 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Other problems: - Reads as a bit clunky; I'd recommend altering to read "1993 hantavirus outbreak in the US" to cut down on repetition of "in"
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Article is new and long enough. Only issue I found is a minor comment about repetitiveness in the hook, which isn't too big of a deal, other than that both hooks are cited inline and I prefer ALT1 as it is more relatable and understandable to the average reader. Earwig is being uncooperative so I am AGF on copyvio/close paraphrasing for now, but I'll check that again when the comment above is addressed. Unrelated to the DYK review, but I'd be happy to (try to) help with the infobox if it's giving you trouble with anything in specific. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:00, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Whispyhistory, we are good to go! The new hook is good (better, IMO, than what I originally suggested). Approving ALT1a for DYK; as for the infobox, I don't think it's too big of a deal - you cover that he was a cricketer in the article and I'm not sure that there would have too much more to add if there was a separate infobox for the physician side of him. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 05:59, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]