Talk:Guy Ritchie/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Mccunicano (talk · contribs) 02:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this article soon. ⑉⑉Mccunicano☕️ 02:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Overall the article seems ready to pass, though there is an issue with referencing detailed below.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- When a reference about the awards Swept Away received at 2002 Raspberry Awards is applied to the article it will be eligible to pass.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- A source for the awards should not be too hard to find, good work so far on this article. Please ping me when you have added that reference. ⑉⑉Mccunicano☕️ 23:05, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- Mccunicano, Thank you for the speedy review. I have added the references, as well as made some minor copyedits to the article. All in all, I'm happy with the article too! Thanks. L150 13:43, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding that. I have a couple of questions for the lead: Is his current marriage really notable enough to be included in the lead? Also, the word film is used a bit repetitively in the second paragraph, perhaps "his directorial debut in a feature film" could be rephrased as "his feature-length directorial debut"? I took care of another instance of "film" being repeated in regards to Ritchie's King Arthur film. ⑉⑉Mccunicano☕️ 00:01, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Mccunicano, I agree with the notability of the current marriage. I've added his marriage to Madonna in the second paragraph and removed any reference to the current marriage. Hopefully this looks better. I've also taken your suggestion and reworded several instances of "film". Thanks. L150 19:21, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for bearing with me during my first GA review process. All in all, I don't see any issues in the article after those adjustments you made. As such, this article has passed. Keep up your good work! ⑉⑉Mccunicano☕️ 00:17, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Mccunicano, I agree with the notability of the current marriage. I've added his marriage to Madonna in the second paragraph and removed any reference to the current marriage. Hopefully this looks better. I've also taken your suggestion and reworded several instances of "film". Thanks. L150 19:21, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding that. I have a couple of questions for the lead: Is his current marriage really notable enough to be included in the lead? Also, the word film is used a bit repetitively in the second paragraph, perhaps "his directorial debut in a feature film" could be rephrased as "his feature-length directorial debut"? I took care of another instance of "film" being repeated in regards to Ritchie's King Arthur film. ⑉⑉Mccunicano☕️ 00:01, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Mccunicano, Thank you for the speedy review. I have added the references, as well as made some minor copyedits to the article. All in all, I'm happy with the article too! Thanks. L150 13:43, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- A source for the awards should not be too hard to find, good work so far on this article. Please ping me when you have added that reference. ⑉⑉Mccunicano☕️ 23:05, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: