Jump to content

Talk:Gutta Percha Company

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconPolymers (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Polymers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
[edit]

According to WP:SEAOFBLUE, When possible, avoid placing links next to each other so that they look like a single link. SpinningSpark 20:18, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikiuser100: please stop edit warring over this and discuss the issue here per WP:BRD. SpinningSpark 23:06, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, good gracious, you have to be kidding, User:Spinningspark. That is an absurd interpretation of a sliver of the MOS. I'm sorry, but I made the original correction - eliminating a senseless redirect - and must stand by it. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 23:10, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I came here first to address this issue at talk - but returning to correct the page I have no idea what you are talking about. There is no "sea of blue". There is a link to what gutta-percha is - natural rubber - with a comma and three words in between. I'm sorry, but you are completely off base here. Hope we meet on more constructive matters down the road. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 23:14, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I didn't see your constructive intermediate change when posting the above. Crisis averted. Two hyperlinks a comma and three words apart. Plus it reads better. Glad we could work this out. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 23:18, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Gutta Percha Company/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 14:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

That's all, not too many comments, but I am concerned a little bit over that generalist material on gutta-percha which doesn't seem directly relevant here. I'll put the nomination on hold. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 19:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything else outstanding besides the quality section? SpinningSpark 15:27, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know yet, I haven't a chance to review the article following your updates. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 16:01, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the updates are satisfactory and the article now passes the GA criteria easily. Good work. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 17:11, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]