Talk:Guru Nanak Dev Thermal Plant

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Punjab Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Punjab portal This article is supported by WikiProject Punjab (India) (assessed as High-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Copyright "Violation"

~~The original website that carries the government sources about the Thermal Plant are property of Indian Government hence is meant to be used and reused by all~~ Jon Ascton (talk) 13:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only certain publications of the Indian Government are free of copyright constraints. In accordance with the Copyright Rules of 1957, most content published in the The Gazette of India, most Acts of Legislature, most official reports prepared for the Table of the Legislature and legal judgments are not copyright protected (though sometimes conditions convey: for instance, there may be requirement that the content remain unmodified or a judicial authority may prohibit reproduction). As far as content from NIC, I'm afraid that this material is not public domain. See [1]: it can only be reproduced with prior permission and modifications are expressly forbidden. This is incompatible with Wikipedia's Terms of Use, I'm afraid, as we can neither prevent modifications nor require prior permission. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. Now nothing that can be called copyright-violation is here

Resolved