Talk:Guinevere Kauffmann

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Germany

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guinevere Kauffmann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is Buzzfeed now a reliable source???

I challenge the claims made solely based on a Buzzfeed "article". In my opinion, this is a clear WP:BLP violation. Buzzfeed is a clickbait mill, not a journalistic endeavor. Wefa (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Buzzfeed was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize, so the challenge that Buzzfeed is not "journalistic" is ludicrous. Buzzfeed also broke stories on harassment allegations against Lawrence Krauss, Geoff Marcy and Christian Ott. It is sourced in WP entries for Krauss and Marcy (there is no English entry for Ott). Multiple Buzzfeed journalists have won awards for their reporting, and the organization as a press pass to cover the US White House. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.37.0.30 (talk) 01:24, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for a prize don't necessarily carry any weight at all. I still maintain that Buzzfeed is a clickbait mill and not a reliable source. I will reefer this to the reliable sources noticeboards for clarification. Wefa (talk) 20:14, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

mixing the cases of GK and TS

from the current article "In an interview with the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, the director of the MPI admitted that the scandal had shown deficiencies in and the need for improvement of the MPI's procedures for dealing with complaints.[17]"

that reference [17] is about Tania Singer, at that time a director of a MPI in Leipzig "Tania Singer, a celebrated neuroscientist and director at the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in Leipzig, Germany, is known as one of the world's foremost experts on empathy." that case has no connnection to GK in Garching/Munich MPI for Astrophysics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A61:3A94:AD01:445C:4E3A:95A5:9805 (talk) 20:02, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]