Talk:Guilty Pleasure (Ashley Tisdale album)

Info ref

• The first source (Welcome to New AshleyMusic.com + album info) in the article confirmed Guilty Pleasure. Juanacho(talk) 1:42, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Please merge

• Could someone plz merge this with Guilty Pleasure (Ashley Tisdale album), Guilty Pleasure (Ashley Tisdale Album), and Guilty Pleasure (album) all together! Thanks 04:50, 27 March 2009 User:Astroman1234

I've put a request in at WP:RM to take care of the naming problem. In the future, please don't create articles under the wrong name when the conditions for creation are satisfied: just edit the redirected article. That causes a lot less trouble.—Kww(talk) 16:10, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Oops, sorry!

It's Alright, It's OK

I think "It's Alright, It's OK" should get it's own page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.57.101 (talk) 22:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

When the single gets sufficient information, notable references, a music video released and charts anywhere, we can think to create a page for it. Decodet (talk) 00:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Repeat information

The info repeat about the single, it's important, later when the single will be a charted single and get own page. Juanacho(talk) 19:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Something wrong

The album doesn't come out in Mexico in April, this fact is FALSE. Sarah, the administrator from AshleyTisdale.com, confirmed it's false, the album doesn't come out in April anyway and anywhere!!! Please, someone take off this information, because when I took it off, someone replaces it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iceland-X (talk • contribs) 18:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

International Bonus Tracks

Why were the Japanese edition version bonus tracks removed from the track listing? They were cited. Skawt (talk) 11:49, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

It's back again on the article. pedrojoão 14:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

If my Life was a Movie

The leaked song, If my Life was a Movie, will be on Guilty Pleasure as bonus track on a special or standard edition of another country? pedrojoão 14:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

A rep for Warner Bros. said a while back on the Ashley Tisdale official message boards that it will probably be used as a bonus track. But no official word yet.67.169.148.40 (talk) 05:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Album cover getting mocked

Many reviews are mocking the album cover Nbeau1989 (talk) 22:30, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Many reviews? You only posted a single site, not a notable one. It also includes almost-pornographic photos. How could it be notable? Decodet (talk) 13:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

References

Adding a professional review

I have been trying to add a professional review from http://www.teentoday.co.uk/article/ashley-tisdale-guilty-pleasure/; however, user Nbeau1989 keeps deleting it with claims like 'not professional reviews done by gossip magazines and teenage publications are not un-bias' and 'barely known gossip magazine and has no credibility to it either'. Firstly, a quick perusal of the website shows it carries numerous other album reviews all written in a professional style with an editorially neutral point of view, and other reviews from the website are featured on Wikipedia album pages. Nbeau1989's claims that it is a 'gossip magazine' are untrue because teentoday.co.uk is not a gossip magazine, it is a legitimate website! The WikiPedia: WikiProject Albums page (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Albums#Professional_reviews) states 'Professional reviews may include only reviews written by professional music journalists or DJs, or found within any online or print publication having a (paid or volunteer) editorial and writing staff (which excludes personal blogs)' and I think the teentoday.co.uk review complies with this. The WikiProject Albums article also states that articles should have ten reviews - and given that there are thus far relatively few reviews for this album, and the majority of them are negative, I think that the teentoday.co.uk review provides a nice balance, as well as making the article more exhaustive and supporting the article's statement that reviews have been 'mixed' - some have been negative, but others have been positive. Checking Nbeau1989's editing history, it appears his main reason for deleting the review is because it is a positive review of Tisdale and all his edits have been to include negative information. What does everyone else think? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.78.48.24 (talk) 04:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

• I read your claims and I think this review should be added to the article. Decodet (talk) 04:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Can i ask why when we already have nearly 6! reviews and teentoday is not even that well known it does not have it's own page to link to on wikipedia and me deleting it was not personal vendetta against anyone or anything i just personaly DONT think it should be in there do you really want to add every single review written about this album to be placed there even ones from lil blog's that dont even have a page on here or would you rather have pages where people can RELATE to and know that it is a trusted review Nbeau1989 (talk) 02:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

What If - own page?

I'm curious to know why "What If" doesn't have it's own page and "Overrated" does. Is there a difference in criteria between the two? 67.169.148.40 (talk) 00:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Just created one. Decodet (talk) 03:06, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Masquerade and Hot Mess Please?!

I think Masquerade and Hot Mess needs to have a page here in Wikipedia cause many people including me are searching and what's to find out... so please..! 67.169.148.40 (talk) 19:05, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

They can't just get their own pages. I personally think that in order to get its own page, a song needs to have charted somewhere, and neither of these songs have yet.Akcvtt (talk) 23:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

i agree both songs should not get there own page unless they chart on numrous charts around the world rather then any single specific one Nbeau1989 (talk) 07:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Second single

The admin of Ashley Tisdale's official boards - managed by Warner Bros. Records - has posted that "Crank It Up" is the official second single and "Masquerade" will be a promotional single, to be released before "Crank It Up". Warner has not posted anything on Tisdale's website but I managed to create a account on Tisdale's forum and I can tell you that's correct. But since it has been confirmed and there's no other reliable source, I think the link to the official board should be used until a new reference becomes available. Other opinions? Decodet (talk) 18:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

If they won't post it in a more official place than a forum, it can't be treated as confirmed.—Kww(talk) 18:49, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

The Masquerade single

The Masquerade promo single is on Spotify, but all the other promo singles aren't. So, Is Masquerade an official single??--84.77.129.250 (talk) 14:41, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Release

The release section is in desperate need of a cleanup ! 11coolguy12 (talk) 11:34, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Countdown

]This article didn't specify about the iTunes Countdown that was released during the album's promotion. I searched for sources but all I could find was this link (which doesn't work anymore) and other forums and blogs but those aren't considered as reliable sources by Wikipedia standards.

I want to ask you guys to find a reliable source that justifies this. I can't find a reliable site that specifies this anymore. Please? Pedro João [talk] 20:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC)