Jump to content

Talk:Guardians of the Galaxy (film)/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 08:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I will review this article. Thank you. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 08:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

General

[edit]

Lead

[edit]

@TriiipleThreat: Actually, "the next several months" sounds a little vague in terms of detail. That's why. Ssven2 speak 2 me 08:36, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

[edit]

Cast

[edit]

Production

[edit]

Development

[edit]
Writing
[edit]

Pre-production

[edit]

Filming

[edit]

Post-production

[edit]
  • "On casting Brolin, Feige said, "We reached out to him and it was one of those things that does not happen all the time but when it does it’s very nice, where he was totally intrigued. He was a fan of what we did, he met with Jeremy Latcham in a hotel in London and learned about the characters a little bit. I spoke to him on the phone a few times. We ran it by James who loved it, ran it by Joss [Whedon] who loved it because Thanos is in this universe because of Avengers. Then we shot him and recorded for it." — This would serve better as a quote in a quotebox. Ssven2 speak 2 me 12:19, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The last paragraph has some big quotes. Explain them rather than just pasting the quote. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 12:19, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Visual effects
[edit]

Release

[edit]

Marketing

[edit]

Conclusion

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
    Pass or Fail:

The current version passes the GA criteria. Congrats! — Ssven2 speak 2 me 13:14, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]