Talk:Gryphaea

Bivalves Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bivalves, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bivalves on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BivalvesWikipedia:WikiProject BivalvesTemplate:WikiProject BivalvesBivalves articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

clarification

The very discover of the Gryphaea at Redcar rocks was Geologist Doctor Lucy McLean.

The Pycnodonte paragraph and two images do not appear to belong in a Gryphaea article. Should I remove them? Wilson44691 (talk) 16:23, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After it was deleted, I salvaged the text and moved it to Pycnodonte newberryi which previously was a redirect only. Ecphora (talk) 21:55, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Big Horn Canyon link is broken.

Also, one abundant source in North America is Red Gulch Dinosaur Tracksite, which is in the Bighorn area. The overburden removed to get at the tracks has perhaps a hundred Gryphaea nebrascensis shells per shovelfull of dirt; it's easy to collect as many as you want. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Howard Landman (talk • contribs) 14:03, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]