Talk:Grumman XTSF/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:22, 1 June 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Resolve the awkward wording about the size increases.

   Should be better now, I hope? - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 18:34, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

   B. MoS compliance:

   Add the location of the publisher to those references that don't have it already.

   Done. - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 18:34, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   This is still pretty thin, but I can't see much else to add.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Thanks! - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 05:42, 3 June 2010 (UTC)