Talk:Grotesque (The X-Files)

Grotesque (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Grotesque (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 3) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 2, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
December 23, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage / The X-Files

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Fair use rationale for Image:Grotesque 3x14.jpg

Image:Grotesque 3x14.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Grotesque (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 04:14, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Infobox: Add "running time" to the infobox.~~
Lede: Add episode overall in the first sentence.
~~Lede: It premiered on the Fox network on February 2, 1996. → It premiered on the Fox network in the United States on February 2, 1996.~~
~~Lede: Link Nielsen household rating to Nielsen ratings~~
~~The episode received mostly positive reviews from critics. → The episode received mostly positive reviews from television commentators.~~
~~Reception: "Grotesque" premiered on the Fox network on February 2, 1996 → "Grotesque" premiered on the Fox network in the United States on February 2, 1996~~
~~Reception: Again — The episode received mostly positive reviews from critics. → The episode received mostly positive reviews from television commentators.~~
Reception: Reviewer Todd VanDerWerff from The A.V. Club → Todd VanDerWerff of The A.V. Club
~~Reception: This is just a suggestion, but. Won't it be best the removed use of the f word in the article. Anyone can read this article! Just a suggestion.~~
~~Reception: awarding it an 8/10 → awarding it an "8 out of 10"~~

On hold. Good work. TBrandley • talk • contributions 04:14, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I did a minor overhaul of the entire article and fixed a few typos and your suggestions. I removed the instance of the profanity, since its not really needed and can be stated much more concisely, like it is now.--Gen. Quon (talk) 14:47, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. I will promote now. TBrandley • talk • contributions 15:51, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]