Jump to content

Talk:Grossology (TV series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In this edit I removed the subheadings from the character list. "Villains" is not an appropriate subheading, as it requires us to interpret the roles the characters play. See WP:PROTAGONIST. Per WP:TVCAST we subdivide into Main and Recurring. "Supporting" is vague and invites crufty additions, where "Recurring" is more specific and invites the addition of significant recurring characters. I don't know anything about the series, so I can't make the call about who constitutes Main characters and who constitutes Recurring characters, however Main should come either from the show's credits or from the producers. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by Thundermist

[edit]

There are a number of erroneous references to the Disney Channel series Liv & Maddie, which has nothing to do with Grossology. How they got here, I don't know, but I'm removing them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thundermist04167 (talkcontribs) 06:21, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thundermist04167, thanks for doing that and for explaining the changes! Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:41, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the process, I accidentally shortened the margins. Can you fix that? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thundermist04167 (talkcontribs) 21:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Thundermist04167: Not sure what you mean. What margins? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Villain list

[edit]

In this edit I removed the good-faith addition of a villain list in the episode summaries. I don't see the value of it. Firstly, we shouldn't be describing people as villains, heroes, protagonists, antagonists or similar interpretive labels per WP:ANTAGONIST. Secondly, the key figures of the story should be included in the episode descriptions. If you say "Ty and Abby must foil Insectiva's plot to use giant, mutated termites to destroy the city" then we can infer that Insectiva is the villain. We don't need to be told that, and we don't need a standalone bullet that repeats that fact. It's crufty and only serves to bloat the table for no reason. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]