This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19
Add a comma after "the spread of the coronavirus".
The reference after "from gathering" is a repost of Variety
"all cast and crew" → "all the cast and crew" or "all cast and crew members"
"Vernoff also said that face masks were worn by all cast and crew while not filming including between takes and during rehearsals, speaking was not allowed in the hair and makeup trailer, cast carried their own makeup bags to do their own last-minute touch-ups, and that different camera lenses were used to make people standing far apart appear closer together" – this sentence is a bit long. I would suggest using colons.
"In addition, cast and crew" → "In addition, the cast and crew"
Deadline Hollywood should be in italics.
"president" should be capitalized for job titles.
Casting
"in July 2020 keeping them" → "in July 2020, keeping them" or "in July 2020 that kept them"
"Patrick Dempsey's return to the series after a five-year absence was a major aspect of the season" – source within this section?
Add a comma after "their return".
Don't start sentences with "Because".
Supergirl should be in italics.
"Leigh was not able to travel to Los Angeles where the series films; Leigh filmed her scenes in Canada where she was filming Supergirl at the time" - this is kinda wordy
"Giacomo Gianniotti who portrayed Dr. Andrew DeLuca exited the series as a main character after being killed off in "Helplessly Hoping" although he later appeared in two other episodes as a vision to Kim Raver's Dr. Teddy Altman." – run on sentence
Add a comma after "As part of his departure".
"Williams character" → "Williams' character"
Link the first mention of Station 19, not the second.
Link the first mention of spin-off, not the second.
Add a comma after "In addition".
"Meliisa DuPrey" – typo
"Lisa Vidal and Melissa DuPrey as part of Grey Sloan's new intern class portraying a mother-daughter pair named Alma and Sara Ortiz." – rephrase
Writing
"Krista Vernoff, the showrunner of both Grey's Anatomy and Station 19, initially considered beginning the season prior to the pandemic or not including it at all but ultimately decided to begin it in the peak of it" – also kinda wordy
Are both quote blocks in #Writing necessary?
"To properly tell the story pandemic" – reword
Add a comma before "the writers opted".
"A medical doctor who serves as a consultant, writer, and executive producer on the series and previously worked for the Center for Disease Control said that the goal of the season was to accurately show the infection rate and transfer of COVID-19." – why does this sentence never mention Zoanne Clack?
"Dr. Andrew DeLuca,was" → "Dr. Andrew DeLuca, was"
"The most notable of these, wraps up the story" – rephrase
Does "stabbing" need to be linked? It's self-explanatory.
"include a character death however, plans" → "include a character death. However, these plans"
"and be functional on the other side" – rephrase
"and explaining that while he was in the hospital with the coronavirus that he had six roommates and was the only white person" – Is this sentence necessary?
Optional, but I prefer creating cite bundles when citing three or more references ([105][106][107] → [105]).
There is no average rating on Rotten Tomatoes...
Ani Bundel with NBC Think stated that "True to form, Season 17 features one of the most coronavirus-centric TV plots we've seen since studios started filming again." – that's not a review, that's an observation. Out of their entire review, I'm sure you can find more criticism/praise than that.
Add a comma after "both dead and alive".
Rotten Tomatoes has three additional reviews that haven't been used yet.
Add a hyphen between "most watched".
Add a comma after "In Live+7 ratings".
The first-day viewers for the premiere should be 5.96 million, not 5.93.
The third episode should also be updated to 5.99 million, not 5.96.
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Just a quick progress update since GAN's are usually only on hold for seven days: I've fixed most of the issues you've brought up, mostly all I have left to address is some of the technical details like moving the short description, adding alt descriptions, and the first point brought up in the references section. A new semester started for me Monday (and I'm roughly taking 18 credit hours) so just asking for a few more days while I find time to finish up these comments. Thanks! TheDoctorWho(talk)03:39, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Alright, sorry it has taken me so long but I think that everything has been addressed. Please let me know if I missed anything, I went a bit out of order at times so some of the smaller things may have gotten lost. I personally did think that both quote blocks in the writing section were useful because they both relate to things that are discussed extensively within the section. Thanks, TheDoctorWho(talk)05:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I recently made an edit here to hide the episode table's caption using {{sronly}}, which was reverted here for accessibility reasons and because it passed FAC like this. As I understand it, the caption does not need to be visually displayed if it is near a heading with a similar name to the episode table, which is the case here – the caption "Grey's Anatomy season 17 episodes" is essentially a wordier way of repeating the heading "Episodes". This is what the info pages for Template:Screen reader-only and Template:Episode table support. Additionally, even if this is an FA, that doesn't mean it has to remain fixed. If other seasons don't use it – as can clearly be seen at List of Grey's Anatomy episodes – I see no reason to introduce it here as a one-off. Thoughts? RunningTiger123 (talk) 21:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The main usage case is when a table is placed immediately below a heading, where the heading is effectively identical to the table's caption. This template may be used to hide the caption from a sighted reader (as it would be duplicative), while allowing a screen reader to hear the caption – for example, if the screen reader reads a list of tables in the article to allow navigation directly to a particular table.
If the table is moved to another location away from the heading, then this template should be removed to allow sighted readers to see the table caption. This is a requirement of WCAG 1.3.1.
Because this table does not exist directly below the heading, it was my understanding that the template should not be used. If it is just a misunderstanding and it needs removed, removing |show_caption=y from the template should be done instead of using {{sronly}}. Thanks, TheDoctorWho(talk)21:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've always understood it that if the heading is near the caption (but not necessarily right next to it), the caption can be hidden – but maybe I've been misinterpreting it. I've pinged a user who frequently provides accessibility reviews at WP:FLC for clarification. RunningTiger123 (talk) 21:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's me! My understanding is that it's fine to use sronly when it's near a heading but not directly adjacent to the heading, because the caption is still there for screen reader software and doing what it's needed to do; that said, the documentation seems pretty explicit that it needs to be directly adjacent (presumably because it's providing some benefit to a group of users that are using visual browsers). In general on Wikipedia, the people advocating for compliance with accessibility principles seem to go by the guideline that "something is better than nothing", and so don't spend time trying to force perfect compliance when there's so many tables/templates that aren't parseable at all. As a result, it seems that what we let slide at FLC isn't exactly what the documentation asks for. So, tl;dr, you "should" have the caption visible, but it's not a big deal either way. --PresN22:08, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.png)
.svg){kind=small}
Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:26, 29 August 2021 (UTC)