Talk:Gregory G. Katsas

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States courts and judges Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright issues

Move from my talk page:

I removed your edit at Gregory G. Katsas because it introduced a copyright violation to the page. The news article said "...recuse himself from matters related to Mueller's investigation that he personally worked on, but did not commit to a recusal for all potential cases stemming from the Mueller probe, saying he would consider the facts of the case before making a decision" and your text included "...has recused himself from matters related to Mueller's investigation that he personally worked on, but did not commit to a recusal for all potential cases stemming from the Mueller probe, saying he would consider the facts of the case before making a decision." No objection to you re-adding content written in your own words. Marquardtika (talk) 22:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Marquardtika: Not only was proper referencing given, it was a sentence fragment for a complex idea, thus difficult to distill and not over simplify. My sentence was not "lifted". I find your mischaracterization insulting, and your use of RevDel overkill. Please remember to assume good faith. X1\ (talk) 01:01, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Copyright violations. You took text from a source and added identical language here. It doesn't matter that you gave "proper referencing." It's a copyright violation. Your content was revision deleted--and not by me, I don't have that user right--because it was a copyright violation. And I'm not assuming any faith here, good or bad, I simply pointed out the fact that you committed a copyright violation. The fact that you either don't understand that you did that, or that you are refusing to admit it, is a problem. Marquardtika (talk) 01:13, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]