This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
I read your post on editors assistance. The tag doesn't neccesarily mean anything negative. It just means it's not quite where we want our articles to be developmentaly. Basically, this article would be classified as a stub, rather than needing wikifying. A stub, is a short blurb about an article that people usually use to get a page created without really doing much to it. Based on the length, it seems to me to be almost a start class, rather than a stub.
Basically what you want to do, is find more sources, add as much information as you can, and get a picture(be careful of the copyright policies though). I would suggest starting with an "early life" section which would include information from birth until he gained notablity. After that, maybe a "rise to fame" style section, and a "other info" style section would be good. Be careful though, because this is a living person it would fall under Biographies of a living person and as such will have much tighter rules on maintaining a neutral point of view. Good luck and I hope you enjoy wikipedia.Drew Smith02:01, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
