Talk:Green Mountain Lookout Heritage Protection Act

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is about one (or many) thing(s).

Background Section

This appears to be text copied from the Oso Mudslide article and doesn't really describe why this is background to the Bill. I suggest replacing the text with the copy below about Patty Murray using the Green Mountain Lookout bill as an economic stimulus package for the community impacted by the Oso Slide (and then link to the slide article. Any objections? Lattetown (talk) 06:48, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I included the information about the mudslide because Senator Murray seemed to be using it as the justification that the bill should be passed immediately (despite having introduced the bill months and months before this happened). If the reason it's related wasn't clear, I'm certainly in favor of that being fixed. Thanks. HistoricMN44 (talk) 13:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]