Talk:Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2015

Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2015 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 24, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Eurovision Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Detailed results

Please, could you give the source from which the detailed results of the national final have been taken? Gianluca91 (talk) 00:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2015/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 19:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did a c/e.
"Following the...for several years" to "Greece had managed to qualify for the final every year since the the introduction of semi-finals in 2004"
"the new Greek broadcaster" to "the new Greek public broadcaster"
Why doesn't the voting section have the usual boilerplate about countries being able to give 1–8, 10, and 12 points?
Images and refs are otherwise fine.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Hi @AryKun: I've addressed your concerns. Please take a look! Grk1011 (talk) 13:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]