Jump to content

Talk:Greatest element and least element

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Greatest element)

It seems that the extreme value article is very close to greatest element. (User:209.90.162.85 forgot to sign.)

Yes, there is some intersection. I think the two articles look at things from a bit different perspectives though, but I am not sure. Let us see if a specialist in order theory would be willing to do some merging from extreme value to to greatest element. For now, I just put a link from the former to the latter article. Oleg Alexandrov 00:27, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Rename article?

[edit]

The article is called "greatest element", but it talks as much about the greatest element as it does about the least element. (Naturally, as they are duals.) I propose to rename the article to "greatest and least element". (Or maybe even to "greatest and least element of a partially ordered set"?) — Tobias Bergemann 23:04, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Upper and lower bounds which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion

[edit]

It is confusing that the intro speaks of a poset, and the definition of a preorderd set.Madyno (talk) 08:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The definition is slightly more general. The special case of a partial order is handled in its 3rd paragraph. I added an "even" to emphasize the special/general relation between both cases. In the lead, I think it is ok to mention just the partial-order case since it is best known. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add mention to well-ordering

[edit]

Should a mention to the well-ordering relation be made since the subject of this article (specifically a least element) is what makes a well-order from a total order? Oneequalsequalsone (talk) 13:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I consider this a good idea. For now, I just added an annotated link under "See also". - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]