Talk:Great Lakes Compact

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Great Lakes Compact article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Comments

I'd like more information regarding the agreement itself. Does it enable new uses of water? Restrict uses of water? What did the compact achieve that was not possible prior to its signing?

--Duane Johnson (talk) 17:53, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

This was on my to-do list so I had some sources compiled. Here they are, they may help.

[1], [2], [3], [4], House bill, Senate bill

--IvoShandor (talk) 06:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll expand with them if I get the chance. FingersOnRoids♫ 22:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added some more links and an infobox. The USA Today story by Cauchon was actually cited in the House report (110-863) in the background and need for legislation section. Tangurena (talk) 05:00, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job fleshing out the stub a bit. An additional note, for the legislation section: the compact had to pass through each state legislature as well as the federal legislature. Some of the above links are discussing the bill in context of the state house or senate. The section should lend itself well to having a "federal" and "state" subsection. The legislative history of the Great Lakes Compact is sure to be interesting. Again, nice work. :-)--IvoShandor (talk) 23:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental Justice and the Great Lakes Compact

There is not a lot of justice for the residents of North Western Racine County and later on the City of Racine Wisconsin. This scholarly Article done by graduate students from the University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee School of Fresh Water Science is a clear analysis of the winners and losers in this rich county vs/ poor county scramble for water resources. [5]https://www.cornellpolicyreview.com/waukesha-diversion/?pdf=4789 Dachvid (talk) 18:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]