Talk:Great Fire of London/Archive 2

Use of "The section '...' is based on ..."

Is the use of "The section '...' is based on ..." (see e.g. ref 37) up to today's FA standards? Doesn't it take away the WP:INTEGRITY of the sections? Also, there are many refs where the page ranges are way too broad, especially in these "The section '...' is based on ..." refs. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(Talk – Contribs)} 11:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It only becomes an INTEGRITY problem if someone inserts material not from that source and does not cite it; otherwise material in these sections can be assumed to come from that source. As to the page ranges, they seem reasonable under the circumstances. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nikkimaria may I archive this section to make way for FAR work? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Useful images?

London before and after the fire of 1666, by Wenceslas Hollar

These two images (when joined) show a panorama of London: top image before the fire, bottom after

Might these images be useful? It would be great if they could somehow be joined together better than attempted here. —2606:A000:1126:28D:6024:292F:BF55:5BD0 (talk) 05:26, 14 December 2018 (UTC) — Modified:20:31, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]