Talk:Great Britain at the Paralympics

Great Britain at the Paralympics is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Olympics: Paralympics High‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Paralympics task force. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Janice Burton

Janice Burton deserves an inclusion as well as her own article. The problem is that I cannot substantiate the claim that she has won 23 medals (noted here). I can confirm 20 medals but I assume the other three came from relay events where the participants have not been recorded - GB certainly got into the medals a few times. Other sources are very hard to come by. violet/riga _^[talk] 14:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think Janice should be added as having 20 medals for now but with a note to the effect above Fmountford (talk) 23:09, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But its not clear where she would sit, having 5 golds, 10 Silver and 5 Bronze Fmountford (talk) 14:45, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Medals by individuals

I dont see the point in this section, perhaps it would be worth clarifying its purpose which only shows 5 athletes when we have many more medal winning athletes, its nature implies that we should have every single medal winning athlete of all time listed on this page.

There is also Jade Etherington and guide Caroline Powell who are the most successful GB Winter Paralympians in history following Sochi 2014 plus Kelly Gallagher and Charlotte Evans who won GBs first ever Winter Gold, in my view you cannot quantify winning a quantity of summer medals with a certain quantity of winter medals due to the complete difference in nature of the games and GBs chances in either perhaps we need to have a Winter and a summer table. Fmountford (talk) 15:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should split into a summer table and winter table - so we would need to add a table for the athletes you have mentioned. Also, I removed the bold formatting from Lee Pearson and Sarah Storey, because there was no explanation for it, but if someone knew why there was bold, then we can replace it in the article, with an explanation. 97rob (talk) 19:55, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, i have added a Winter table, I was wondering whether it should be a top 5 or top 10 table Fmountford (talk) 20:14, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The summer table appears to include those who have won over 10 gold medals. We should probably have a top 5 table, which would amount to ten athletes over the two tables, if you can find the information from past games? 97rob (talk) 20:30, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have found 5 for now, leave it for that for a moment, can evolve over time.Fmountford (talk) 21:05, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Britain at the Paralympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20050415121010/http://www.taoiseach.gov.ie/attached_files/Pdf%20files/Constitution%20of%20Ireland.pdf to http://www.taoiseach.gov.ie/attached_files/Pdf%20files/Constitution%20of%20Ireland.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]