Jump to content

Talk:Grazing Goat Pictures

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGrazing Goat Pictures has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 26, 2015Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 20, 2014.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 2012 satirical comedy drama OMG – Oh My God! was the first film produced by Grazing Goat Pictures Pvt. Ltd?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Grazing Goat Pictures/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I should have this to you by tomorrow JAGUAR  18:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

[edit]
  • "Its first film OMG – Oh My God!, was banned in UAE and Malaysia" - I would write out United Arab Emirates fully here
  • "In India a few screenings of the film had to be cancelled and a police case was lodged against the filmmakers and actors for hurting religious sentiments" - might read better as A few screenings of the film had to be cancelled in India and a police case lodged against the filmmakers and actors for harming religious sentiments
  • The lead meets WP:LEAD and the GA criteria, though I would mention a little more on the production house's history in order to fully summarise
  • "The film received poor initial collection at the box office[15] but because of word of mouth it picked up and proved to be a commercial success" - this claim of success due to word of mouth is unreferenced, though I stand wrong if it's in one of the other citations. Also it might be better to replace "because" with "due to"

References

[edit]

Close - promoted

[edit]

I couldn't find anything major enough to constitute putting this on hold - so I'll promote this now. It is overall well written, well referenced and the article is broad, thus meeting the GA criteria. Well done! JAGUAR  11:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]