Talk:Gravensteen

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Belgium Mid‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / European / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Copied content, correct content?

I'm suspicious about the bulk of the content on this page - it may have been copied from this page.
However, is it even correct? This page, discussing the Pénitencier du Camaret-sur-Mer in Brittany has a description which is in many parts identical (even the sizes and dates).
For these reasons, I added a cleanup tag. --David Edgar 17:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of the veracity of the figures given, even of suspicions of frudulence, the article is poorly and sloppily written. A cleaning up is entirely necessary. - Gregory II of Hare Grove

The text that was most likely copied from [1] has been removed. (See Wikipedia:Copyright_problems.) -Teryx 07:18, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned the articule up and added some data I got from the castle itself (handy if you live at two minutes from it) --B-west 08:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gravensteen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081005220233/http://www.chateaubizar.be/ to http://chateaubizar.be/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:19, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]