Jump to content

Talk:Grauballe Man

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wig?

[edit]

Is that his real hair or is that a wig? jengod 21:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's real, although it's not the original colour. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Niffux (talkcontribs) 17:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Yup, it is his actual hair. Valentinian T / C 13:56, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Close up, you can also spot his stubble. RhinoMind (talk) 02:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Irreconcilable dates

[edit]

The leder says the body was uncovered in 1952. The the third section ("Discovery, Preservation and Exhibition") says it was discovered in 1956 yet went on display in 1955. Could someone please sort the correct dates? 71.234.215.133 (talk) 00:17, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The body was likely examined for a few years after it was discovered, and then put on display. --GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 23:16, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gut contents

[edit]

His gut contents are too interesting to pass over.--Wetman (talk) 16:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, didn't they find a large amount of ergot, which would've made him act like he was possessed? (cf Secrets of the Dead - Bewitched; argues the same thing happened in the Middle Age witch trials) Harshmustard (talk) 20:55, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grauballe Man. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hgjsdb nvfsgyurebd

[edit]

@Hgjsdb nvfsgyurebd: Could you please explain the deletion of the materials from the article? Could you please elaborate why it is false information? Thanks. SunDawntalk 09:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Facial reconstruction

[edit]

No description or context, no source information whatsoever, dead link in the commons file. Totally worthless. 2A02:AA1:1640:F051:DCD9:E10:D5D5:1BFC (talk) 17:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]