This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
For some reason the portrait image (which actually showed Flower's face) was replaced with a photo that also appears below. Was there a good reason for this? At the moment the photo in the infobox is really useless for anyone wanting to know what the subject looks like. The other image was a little fuzzy, but I think it does a better job than the action shot currently in the infobox. I feel that it should be changed back, but am new to the cricket project and don't want to step on any toes. What does everyone think? I'm happy to go with whatever concensus determines, so please state whether you agree or not and we can go from there. Cheers. — AustralianRupert (talk) 03:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It was a bot that switched the image but I can't exactly see why, for the reasons you've stated I have switched the infobox image back to the previous portrait shot. --Jpeeling (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
