Talk:Grandfather Ivan (historical myth)

Bulgaria Low‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Drink water from the well - for "Serbian ruler" Konstantin Dragash

Information from the Turkish historian Hoca Sadeddin Efendi (1) in his chronicle Crown of Histories about the Bulgarian character of North Macedonia at the time of Constantine Deyan (2) 17th c.

Indeed, the Kyustendil ruler, known by the name of Constantine and famous for possessing extensive lands and spahis (warriors - editor's note), was the supreme ruler in the Bulgarian region and was in possession of the lands in which the Tala and Nakra mines were situated ...

(Yordan Ivanov (literary historian), The Bulgarians in Macedonia), Sofia, 1917, p. 162; the original is in Turkish

1. The author of travel notes 2. Constantine Deyan, ruler of the Velbuzhd principality in south-western Bulgaria, who became a Turkish vassal and died in 1394 in the war against the Wallachian chieftain Mircea I of Wallachia. Angel Angel 2 (talk) 01:49, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So, you have no modern historians to support you claim? Everywhere in Wiki he is a Serbian prince.--Nicoljaus (talk) 05:11, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have already been blocked by vandalism. Once you have decided to impose these - continue in the same spirit. Apparently administrators tolerate such things. I do not want to get into a dispute after first removing and then posting. Apparently the property is yours. Angel Angel 2 (talk) 11:16, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]