Talk:Grande Noirceur

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Quebec Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2022 and 16 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Charosiers (article contribs).

[Untitled]

This article is racked with POV. I don't mean any disrespect to the person(s) that wrote it, but it is clearly handling the subject from an anti-Duplessis point of view, when in theory it should only be giving the facts.

Interpreting POV Application

I notice the above comment is unsigned. I am leaving the POV tag in for now, but one must keep in mind that articles can suffer from POV with cause. For example, the article on Adolf Hitler could be similarly tagged in places. (And I'm not suggesting any particular association between Duplessis and Hitler in making that statement; analogy isn't intended beyond the statement itself.) I'd suggest that, when revisions are forthcoming, that the reader be somewhat forgiving interpreting and applying the strictures of POV guidelines with this subject. ross613 (talk) 14:51, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV

in this topic it is inescapable to not have a POV as it was a discription of the time from a point of view, but the POV should be stated at the top none the less. Just to add to your comment Ross613. Jonathon (talk) 05:59, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

-- No refference to the Duplessis Orphans--

it is shocking there is no refference to the duplessis orphans in this article, particularily since there is a strong article already on the wiki discussing the specifics of the Duplessis Orphans. please find included a link to the main wiki article for the duplessis orphans.

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Duplessis_Orphans

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Grande Noirceur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080511195608/http://www.cbc.ca:80/thesundayedition/features/murdochville.html to http://www.cbc.ca/thesundayedition/features/murdochville.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]