Talk:Grand Hotel (Mackinac Island)

Michigan Mid‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Upgrade

I made an update to mention that the Grand Hotel now has air-conditioning in all rooms. I wasn't sure if I needed to cite (nor do I know how yet!), but the link is here: http://www.wzzm13.com/news/watercooler/watercooler_article.aspx?storyid=73830 . 75.40.225.228 (talk) 23:58, 15 April 2007

Assessment

I would still rate this start class. IvoShandor 01:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pushing B class though. I would get rid of small sections and combine them elsewhere, I would use a more specific title for another section, "hotel features" sounds like something you would see in an advertising brochure. Some minor tweaks could make the structure and content more obvious. IvoShandor 22:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm giving it a 'B' for the Michigan WikiProject assessment. It's a toss-up, though. I'll grant that. --Elliskev 00:53, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per emerging criteria for NRHP's that are National Historic Landmarks (NHLs), under discussion in talk page of WP:NRHP, I would rate this Stub for WP:NRHP, as it does not meet all the following criteria.

at least a short intro is written that is factually and grammatically correct. MEETS
NRHP infobox is included. It may appear late in the article, if the article is started by another infobox, or it may appear just following another infobox. FAILS
NHL designation date is included within the NRHP infobox. FAILS
NHL summary source is referenced as source for NHL designation date. FAILS
NRHP inventory/nomination text or NHL nomination text is linked (if available) FAILS
accompanying NRHP photo set is linked (if available) FAILS
that any "official site" of the owner or controlling organization, if any, is included as an External link. Format as "Official site: (link)". NOT SURE
that External links section exists and includes at least one link. NOT SURE
that See Also section exists and points to List of NHLs in the state. FAILS

Note, it would be pretty easy to revise the article to meet all these criteria for Start rating. There are further criteria to reach B rating. I am changing the rating to Stub now. Please feel free to follow up with me. doncram 03:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should price listings be removed?

There's a lot of mention of how much it costs to spend the night, eat lunch and odd things. That doesn't seem relevant to an encyclopedia article. It's very specific and would require citations or constant updating as prices change. Comments? --GreatTurtle (talk) 20:13, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like a brochure

A large amount of the content added by this edit [1] appears to be copied directly from the Grand Hotel website. Sentences like "Grand Hotel has a wide array of activities to keep guests entertained or to just relax in the true classic American style." make this seem like an advertisement. I no longer have time to edit things as much as I used to but I would appreciate it if someone could convert this to NPOV style if they have time. --GreatTurtle (talk) 20:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grand Hotel (Mackinac Island). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121008091714/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1233&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1233&ResourceType=Building

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Grand Hotel (Mackinac Island). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Grand Hotel (Mackinac Island). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]