Talk:Graham Nash (quiz contestant)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Is he really one of only two unbeaten champions? I thought there were three - Nic Brown (who didn't take part in the Supreme Championship), Harvey Freeman and Graham Nash. (Scott Mearns is unbeaten in open competition too, though he lost an invitation match to Natascha Kearsey.) --Bonalaw 10:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- If we're taking into account Freeman's loss in the Masters tournament against Scrabble ace Mark Nyman, this becomes two, rather than three.[1] Bobo. 20:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
'Champion of Champions' para 3 - if the difference was 1 point before the final (conundrum) round, the scores after could not be as stated. Also the sum of 102 and 109 is not 229 - or am I missing something? Rentwa 12:03, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
If you change 102 to 120 it all makes sense (this is also the score on the CDP. Mglovesfun 16:14, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Articles for Deletion debate
[edit]This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Docg 02:07, 4 January 2007 (UTC)