Talk:Grafton Elliot Smith

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Ancient Egypt Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Grafton Elliot Smith is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the field of physiology.

[Untitled (a)]

_Poor English_

[Untitled (b)]

The words: "a smell dominated insectivore stage of jumping shrew-type" make little sense to me. Please can someone who understands what this is all about correct this. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.144.188.98 (talk) 10:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC) I have improved the text slightly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.139.171.34 (talk) 14:08, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Millar

Millar implied that Grafton Elliot Smith might have faked Piltdown Man. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.139.171.34 (talk) 14:10, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

-As did Micheal Cremo. This may warrant further study. researchALLwars 06:40, 12 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ResearchALLwars (talk • contribs)

The finger for this hoax is usually pointed at its discoverer, Charles Dawson, based in part on some 1950's comments by former associates. Jwilsonjwilson (talk) 21:57, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperdiffusion

"The concept of hyperdiffusionism is now referred to by more neutral terms (when referring to the Americas) such as Pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact."

It strikes me as a bit hyperbolic to equate preColumbian transoceanic contacts with hyperdiffusionism. There seems to be little dispute about the transient presence of Norsemen at L'anse aux Meadows in Newfoundland circa 1000AD (for instance), yet nobody posits this as evidence that all (or even any) culture in the Americas is derived from the Vikings.

It would make much more sense to equate postColumbian transoceanic contacts with hyperdiffusionism.

Jwilsonjwilson (talk) 21:24, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]