Talk:Gpl-violations.org

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 December 2005. The result of the discussion was NO CONSENSUS.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Needs fleshing out

This article could do with some fleshing out, including some case histories, list of successful cases, etc. An impact analysis would also be great. Achitnis 14:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

German court precedent?

I thought German law didn't recognize Stare Decisis... AnonMoos 21:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Website down and Fantec case

The gpl-violations.org website appears to be down, does anyone have news with how the organisation is doing?

Additionally they won a case against Fantec in 2013, not sure if notable, details here Jonpatterns (talk) 13:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it's back up now. Don't know when that happened, though... 199.58.98.69 (talk) 04:46, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it went back up in October 2015. http://gpl-violations.org/news/20151027-homepage-recovers/ 199.58.98.69 (talk) 04:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gpl-violations.org. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141007073104/http://gpl-violations.org/news/20060922-dlink-judgement_frankfurt.html to http://gpl-violations.org/news/20060922-dlink-judgement_frankfurt.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gpl-violations.org. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]