Talk:Government of Vermont

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Vermont Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Suggest deleting senators and rep from this article

While the senators and rep should be (and are) prominently mentioned in Vermont articles elsewhere, I think they are better and more accurately placed under "political" categories. They are supposed to vote for national things and not govern Vermont, pe se. I think they should be deleted here. They are all over other Vermont related articles. Student7 (talk) 15:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Group F employees

Does anyone understand "Group F" employees and why there are so many of them as opposed to "regular" employees, whatever they are? In June 2008, there were 11,840 people working for the government but they were group F.Hallenbeck, Terri (July 1, 2008). Pension plans change today for state workers. Burlington Free Press.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: year (link) The following day, the BFP came out with another article by yet another author with a figure that sounded more in line with what was there earlier, so I used it instead. Student7 (talk) 17:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inheritance vs estate taxes

Where was it that the difference between inheritance taxes and estate taxes is clearly defined? Maybe we need linkable definition. Student7 (talk) 12:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mea culpa

I put a lot of what the government has done in here which really belongs in Politics of Vermont. This is really supposed to tell how the government works. The operational details probably need to be moved to "Politics...". Student7 (talk) 22:40, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Government of Vermont. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Government of Vermont. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

DavidZuckermanHeadshot.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:53, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]