This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Thanks to Ltwin for starting this article. I have ticked it for the NPP as it is obviously quite respectable. But it's unusual for articles to be so well-developed from the outset. Sometimes this is done by taking material from elsewhere such as another language Wikipedia. In such cases, attribution of the earlier versions is required for full propriety. I have made some spot checks using tools like Earwig and didn't find any issues. But, to be sure, please could Ltwin give some details of how they wrote this to help us understand what was done offline. Such background details may also help other reviewers as the article is further assessed and graded. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:09, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the details. Sometimes, editors move the sandbox into mainspace using the article title to preserve the edit history but I'm not seeing any problem with making a fresh copy in this case.
I plan to read through the article and may make minor copy-edits if needed -- I did one just now. If any major issues arise, I will start discussion here again.