Talk:Governance framework
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kelizabethan.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Peer Feedback (from Kevin)
[edit]Hey Kyra,
Even though your draft got deleted [I'm so sorry :'( ], I think the topic you chose, Governance Frameworks, is very cool and worth pursuing There seems to be lots of information about what governance frameworks are, but I would try to find some more specific definitions or maybe even the history/why the concept exists. Here's a source that I found with an awesome definition and general overview of governance frameworks: https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article/22/1/1/944908/An-Integrative-Framework-for-Collaborative.
Good luck and be sure to save often! Let me know if there's anything that you want reviewed as you write, I'm happy to assist :)
-Kevin R.
Misc
[edit]Below this line moved from Sandbox to talk page to avoid problems with article move:[edit | edit source] http://scu.edu.au/governance/index.php/4
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40750687.pdf
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X07000097
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10580530701586136
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1579685/?reload=true
https://www.claytonutz.com/knowledge/2012/april/writing-good-governance-frameworks-a-how-to-guide
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/003803857200600101
Review of "Community Development"[edit | edit source] Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference No - the information regarding CD internationally and what organizations affiliate themselves with the term or profession is not cited; neither is the section on what community developers do. Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Yes, this part: “The Community Development Journal, published by Oxford University Press, since 1966 has aimed to be the major forum for research and dissemination of international community development theory and practice” - this belongs in a separate page which should then be linked. This also does not belong with the CD theories: “Women Self-help Group; focusing on the contribution of women in settlement groups.” Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? It mostly comes from the UN - limited Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? It seems particularly anglo--centric in sources and amount of writing on the UK and US, although the entries in Canada and Australia are almost unreadably incoherent Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article? Most worked - “United Nations Development System-A Collective Approach to Supporting Capacity Development resulted in a 404 “can’t be found” error - it was likely deleted or updated and Wiki hasn’t been fixed to reflect that. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? Many of the details are un-cited or lacking in definitions or details. The article is missing recent information! Check the "talk" page of the article - what is the Wikipedia community saying about how to present this topic? How is the article rated in terms of Wikipedia's quality scale? It does not have a warning banner, but it is not “featured” or otherwise singled out in a good way, besides being part of the WikiProjects for our class and 2 others. The talk seems fairly minimal and there have been a few changes to remove (to start a new article) and to correct an opinion into supported fact. However, nothing has been said about fixing the glaring inconsistencies in length between regions and citing, since most of the article is not properly cited. So on the quality scale, it would fall very low! Create a section in your sandbox where you will take notes about what you've learned during this process. Oops! This was originally done in Google docs then added to sandbox later for instructional purposes.