Talk:Gopikabai

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India: Maharashtra Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).

Issues

"Gopikabai blamed Radhikabai for being a bad omen", "Instead of giving emotional support, Gopikabai continually nagged Nanasaheb Peshwa" need references. "Instead of giving emotional support" is author's non-neutral personal view. "Envy and ego" is also non-neutral
The lone ref in the article "Patil, Vishwas. Sambhaji." does not any details about the book like yr, publisher, language. The WP:RS value of this source is doubtful. Also, a book on Sambhaji is an odd choice to source any article on the Peshwa (who appear later in history).

--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:05, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:05, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]