Talk:Google Public DNS

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Google Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

DNS hijacking

All other popular DNS providers practice a form of DNS hijacking while processing queries, causing web browsers to redirect to an advertisement site run by the provider when a nonexistant domain name is entered.

A couple of questions / remarks:

Every single other DNS provider? Really?
What constitutes a popular DNS provider? Are ISPs considered DNS providers?
There are other popular, free DNS services that don't hijack, e.g. dns.as250.net
The DNS hijacking can often be disabled (e.g. OpenDNS)

— DataWraith (talk) 09:43, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hope that I resolved this, changed all of to some and took out dubious claims against spec. isps Flying Hamster (talk) 15:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Privacy

ive added Citation tag as its way off google now store ip address and unspecified info on your use of the dns service since march http://www.google.com/policies/privacy/ Sparkler99 (talk) 12:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed your citation request since your link doesn't even mention DNS. This is the relevant privacy policy: https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/privacy 27.33.43.226 (talk) 09:07, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thats the same link thats use as reference 10 Sparkler99 (talk) 09:27, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screenshot of twitter feed.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Screenshot of twitter feed.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Screenshot of twitter feed.gif)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:31, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

kickass.to

Why is Google censoring the domain kickass.to? This should be on Wikipedia. 85.247.151.69 (talk)

This isn't censorship. Google Plublic DNS have some problems from time to time. Current the service have a lot of problems with the Top-Level-Domain .fm (e.g. dancetime.fm). Try it a few hours later until Google will refresh the cache or use the DNS from your provider. --95.114.79.198 (talk) 02:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Google Public DNS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140324013445/http://todayszaman.com/news-342851-turkey-becomes-first-country-ever-to-ban-google-dns.html to http://www.todayszaman.com/news-342851-turkey-becomes-first-country-ever-to-ban-google-dns.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]