Talk:Goodbye, Sarah Jane Smith

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Doctor Who Mid‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

24.241.6.149

This user has removed the word "ironically" due to the circumstances of Lis Sladen's death which I had written and I take offence to remarks he made in his edit summary. It was a personal attack/defamation against me. So because of this I have reinserted the word "ironically" in the article and if he wants to remove the word "ironically" again then he should do so without making snide remarks against me in his edit summary. The Shadow Treasurer (talk) 21:44, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Snide remarks notwithstanding, "ironically" is rather POV. DonQuixote (talk) 21:54, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Ironically" was used as a general not a personal point of view. I don't think you got the point I was making and that is snide remarks should not be made in the edit summary. The Shadow Treasurer (talk) 04:19, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A general point of view is still a point of view. DonQuixote (talk) 12:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]