Talk:Good-Loop

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

COI note

I am a director at the company, so I have a conflict of interest. I made this -- trying to be neutral, but of course it's hard to tell. Hopefully someone without a conflict of interest will confirm it as OK. One line I feel might not be NPOV in tone is "over 100 press mentions" -- this is to help show notability. --winterstein (talk) 17:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Winterstein: Thank you for disclosing your conflict of interest. I went ahead and removed the sentence about the press mentions since it was only sourced to the company website. If this was mentioned in an independent source, it would be more appropriate to include. To help establish notability, would you consider adding more citations of the independent press coverage? That would establish notability more effectively than simply saying such coverage exists. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 19:11, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]