Talk:Gone in 60 Seconds (1974 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

California: Southern California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force.

Needs to have the grammar and spelling cleaned up and the cast list condensed with a table of only the main characters. Who wants to know the identity of the person who played "Policeman"? hitman012 19:12, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I have cleaned up the "Plot" section and a friend is in the process of writing new material. I aim to condense the cast section into the main characters soon and will subsequently remove the cleanup tag once this is completed. hitman012 19:12, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As for merging this article, I think it is a tough chore because In the 2000 remake of this film, there was a car named "Eleanor" as well; however the Eleanor from the new version was a 1968 silver and blue Shelby, I think. Definitely not a 1973 yellow Mach 1. Slickshoes3234 11:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

how....

did they possibly get away with speeding in real traffic?

Merge tag

It should have the same treatment as the Shelby had in Gone in 60 seconds in 2000 (see Shelby_Mustang#1967). The information should be merged from 1973 Ford Mustang Mach 1 - Eleanor into Gone in 60 Seconds (1974 film) & in the section Ford_Mustang_Mach_1#Growth_Happens. Plus it is not linked to and it isn't that notable. Lincher 17:46, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Halicki-Bashing v. Halicki-Gushing

Although the original version of the film had a different music score, the reissue in 2000 and 2004 contained the nonoriginal score which could be deemed as if George Lucas reissued the original Star Wars trilogy with altered scenes and/or additional scenes not seen from the initial release. There should have been a reissue with 2 versions of the original Gone in 60 Seconds.

Pop Culture reference

There should be a pop-culture reference, as it is not uncommon to hear people talk about a particular favourite car with phrases like, "My Eleanor" or "My unicorn", which almost certainly originated with this film (or possibly with the remake, but who knows). Does anyone else concur? It looks like it might be difficult to find web references for this particular expression. Jpipkin42000 22:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find a verifiable source for them being common expressions and originating with the film, fine; I've never heard or read the phrases... --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are links like the following, I'm just not sure how well they work in the wiki context:

   http://www.ratemyride.com/profile.php?uid=982
   http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2392026
   http://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=140671
   http://bigcoupe.com/members/DC
   http://www.sounddomain.com/ride/744463
   http://www.ratemyride.com/profile.php?uid=3477

and to directly reference Gone in Sixty Seconds:

   http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/forum/showpost.php?s=b2f09b134e53f2070c9ee0ac7c9df701&p=316072&postcount=56
   http://www.ciao.co.uk/Alfa_GTV_3_0_L__Review_5544614

Jpipkin42000 23:01, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In reference, my first google-hack was: "my eleanor" -mustang

My second was: "my eleanor" -mustang +gone +seconds —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jpipkin42000 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 22 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Jpipkin42000 23:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re. the "Production" section

I'm a bit underwhelmed by the first two sentences of the "Production" section, that read: "Gone in 60 Seconds was classified as an independent film — H. B. Halicki wrote, starred, directed, produced and even did his own stuntwork in the film, which, at the time, was phenomenal. In a contemporary context, however, the portions of the film preceding the chase sequences are seen as typical of a badly acted 1970s movie. "

There are some strange suggestions made here:

It used to be phenomenal that one person wrote, starred, directed, produced and did the stunts for a movie, but now it is not anymore;
From a current perspective, the acting is bad. Inference: current acting is better than acting 40 years ago;
There is a genre called "1970s movies", which suggests that they have more in common than just having produced in the 70s.

Not to mention the weasel wordings: "[the film] was classified as an independent film" and "[the first scenes of the film] are seen as typical of a [...] 1970s movie".

I would suggest a re-write of this section; I'd do it myself but I have not seen this film, I have no knowledge of film studies or anything related and I don't really know my way around 1970's USA either.

82.95.90.204 (talk) 14:46, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The "Production" section lacks references in its entirety. I'm not surprised that it has these issues. The article has not gotten much attention from anyone, unfortunately. If you want to rewrite it, you could search on Google Books Search and include results such as these. Erik (talk | contribs) 14:53, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eleanor60

Would someone kindly inform user Eleanor60 that their non-encyclopedic edits are making it very difficult to manage this page? Cudak888 (talk) 19:25, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gone in 60 Seconds (1974 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060429204206/http://www.halicki.com/ to http://www.halicki.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Original 1973 Ford Mustang Mach 1 Eleanor.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:09, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]