Talk:Going Clear (film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn (talk · contribs) 18:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'll be reviewing this article. -- Matthew RD 18:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

1. Well written? No issues that are apparent to me here. It does seem well written. Well done. Y

2. Verifiable? Y

3. Broad in coverage? Y

4. Neutral? Got all sides of the issues, including positive reviews with some negative critiques in it, and responses from the church, no matter how bonkers it might be. Y

5. Stable? No recent edit conflicts, or at all. Y

6. Images? Y

Notes

• I hear the doc is getting seven Emmy nominations. Perhaps there should be a mention of this.

• Thanks, I've added a section on this. Will await the rest of your review with interest - thanks for taking this on! Prioryman (talk) 22:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

• It's a pleasure. I'll probably never think of Tom Cruise the same way again, though. Anyway, I've finished reviewing the article, there's just a couple of things needed to be taken care of. -- Matthew RD 21:32, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

• Cites #23 and #42 don't have a publisher on the templates.

• Fixed this. Prioryman (talk) 10:09, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

• "The church complained that Gibney had declined to interview 25 of its members whom it had put forward to him.[7] According to Gibney, Miscavige, Travolta, and Cruise all declined interviews and the church instead offered "a delegation of 25 unidentified individuals, presumably to smear the people in our film", which did not interest him.[37]" The Miscavige, Travolta and Cruise declining interviews bit is not supported by cite #37, but it is supported by cite #7.

• I think I must have mixed up the order of the citations there - thanks for spotting it. Fixed now. Prioryman (talk) 10:11, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Overall just some nit picky things, but impressive article overall. I will give you seven days, but I doubt it would even take one, after which I will pass this. -- Matthew RD 21:32, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

@Matthew R Dunn: Sorry about the slight delay in completing this, but it should all be done now. Prioryman (talk) 10:11, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

That's alright. Everything's sorted now so I can gladly say I'll pass this article. Good job. -- Matthew RD 17:45, 26 July 2015 (UTC)