Talk:God Forbid

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal

Vote for Deletion

This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 00:49, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That's insane. What a bunch of idiots. Don't delete this.

What twats wanted this deleted? I can't see any good reason for it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.243.96 (talk) 16:41, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

metalcore?

god i hate this dumb genre,i guess any band can be it... I mean who made this page?... do you even listen to god forbid... where does emtacore come from...death metal my friend

They're not Death Metal, you need to go and look up about these genres as this is the 3rd page you've wrongly edited like this. XdiabolicalX 11:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then I guess I must've been dreaming when I saw them open for Death Metal bands Incantation, Vader & Morbid Angel in late June 1998 at the Birch Hill in Old Bridge, New Jersey. Reject the Sickness is indeed a death metal album & so is Out of Misery.--Hndsmepete 19:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a huge fan of this band, I also think that the death metal influence should be added in there somewhere. Hndsmepete is right about those early albums. The metalcore genre, however, is an acceptable label for this band. As much as I hate to say it, the metalcore influence is undeniable in their more recent albums. I have to mention that my hate for traditional metalcore and hardcore bands is limitless. God Forbid is different simply just doesn't suck at all. BTW they are also a self-proclaimed black metal band. --Dalenkwint 15:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this band is a Death metal band. they started as a metalcore band but switched in "determination" if they were a metalcore band they would sound like a bunch of no talent teenage losers playing offbeat and hitting either random or the same notes on the guitar. in other words they would sound like "crap" instead of sounding like they wanted to kill you with music (which is how they sound now) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.67.69.148 (talk) 22:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again, another genre war :( Feral Mind (talk) 22:15, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another POINTLESS genre war. Do you guys even know what death metal sounds like? God Forbid is, and always has been, metalcore. And who they've opened for in the past has absolutely NO bearing on their genre. Marilyn Manson opened for Slayer, that certainly doesn't make them thrash metal. 65.189.210.173 (talk) 10:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They're almost certainly Melodic Metalcore with strong influences taken from Melodic Death Metal. There, problem solved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.243.96 (talk) 16:39, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They are a mixture of Melodeath and Metalcore with heavy Thrash influences. Kezian Avenger 18:02, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GodForbid.jpg

Image:GodForbid.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:God Forbid - IV.jpg

Image:God Forbid - IV.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:God Forbid - GF.jpg

Image:God Forbid - GF.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:God Forbid - Determination.jpg

Image:God Forbid - Determination.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

melodeath???

what the hell..theyre definitely not death metal, neither brutal, nor melodic. you know old In Flames and DT?? THAT is melodeath. i think that should be removed immediately.

Maybe if you're an annoying metal purist... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.55.230 (talk) 01:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citation for Genre

I have a citation for the thrash metal tag, but I'm not good enough with wikipedia to put it up. I put all the coding that I could throw together in here, http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifrxqwdld6e , theres the link, could someone else throw it up? ^[1]
PEiP (talk) 21:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Eduardo Rivadavia. "IV: Constitution of Treason". All Music Guide. Retrieved 2008-01-01.

WTF?

Melodic Thrash Metal is not a fucking genre.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on God Forbid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on God Forbid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070318012520/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=47756 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=47756
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.listenout.net/news/37673

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Eduardo Rivadavia. "IV: Constitution of Treason". All Music Guide. Retrieved 2008-01-01.

[1]