Talk:Gnosall

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

England

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Which (fairly recent) year did the village win the "Best Village" (can't remember if it was "...in England" or "...in Britain") award? I seem to remember it was mentioned on the road signs as you entered the village. David Philip Aaron Alexander Jones ON

Hmm...I think there's a Best Kept Village and Britain in Bloom plaque up. Not sure of the years, but I'll try and remember to look next time I happen to drive past the signs. Not saying I'll remember, though... – drw25 (talk) 20:47, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Best Kept Village 1997, apparently. I could've sworn that there was something more recent, but I couldn't see anything... – drw25 (talk) 16:51, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps this article could be expanded a little? A note could be made about the carnival, the old lock-up, etc. - although I'm far too lazy to do it myself. By the way; hi Jonesy & Warren. CTC 15:46, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I editerised it ^^ (SirronTheMighty 20:55, 7 March 2006 (UTC))[reply]

"Information for Reporters" removed from article text

I removed this from the text. – drw25 (talk) 20:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We know you use wikipedia for your random facts rather than original research, and that's ok, but make sure you read it correctly. For your information, Gnosall is NOT a "small village". It's actually an extremely large one, one of the largest in the country. It has no cobbled streets and very few old buildings. The suicides are not unusual at all, when you take into account that the village's population is more suggestive of a town than a village. Drop the story, that goes for you too, The Guardian. Perhaps you should use more than just a quick read of The Sun and a random fact-grab from this page?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.147.72 (talk • contribs)
Gnosall is known as 'Village of the doomed' According to a writer from the Sun newspaper due to 6 suicides in the past 12months but locals say that this information is wrong.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.149.212 (talk • contribs)

In fact, it IS accurate - speaking as a friend of one of the people who committed suicide and is listed in that article, and someone who attempted it herself several times. I know several people who grew up in the village, some who still live there, who have also attempted suicide: the mental health care in the area is worse than abysmal, and the isolation does not help. Thank you Drw25 for removing those comments from the text - it does a disservice to the specific people involved by denying that anything is wrong or unusual about Gnosall's suicide rate. (And yes, I am a local - my family on one side have been living in the village for centuries, and I grew up there.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.116.231 (talk) 03:11, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gnosall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]