Talk:Global Rights

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Untitled

I'd like to touch up the text discussing the "Bias" of Global Rights due to the fact that they take government money. The statement that they are "biased" (as an unsourced statement) violates http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:ASF#A_simple_formulation Pmw2cc (talk) 20:41, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view

Large parts of the article are not written from an uninvolved point of view, but from the organization's own perspective. "Thematic Programs" is far too detailed, even uses first person language ("our"), and is probably plagiarizing some text on the organization's own website. The entire section needs to be trimmed and rewritten. GermanJoe (talk) 03:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]