Jump to content

Talk:Global Human Rights Defence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Global Human Rights Defence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns about promotional content and conflict of interest

[edit]

I have serious concerns that this article may be an undisclosed paid advertisement rather than a neutral, encyclopedic entry:

1. Lack of neutral tone: The article presents an overwhelmingly positive view of GHRD without any critical analysis or balancing perspectives.

2. Excessive detail: The article contains an unusual level of detail about minor events and internal operations for a relatively small NGO.

3. No independent sources: Nearly all information appears to be sourced directly from GHRD materials or representatives, lacking verification from independent, reliable sources.

4. Promotional language: The text frequently uses laudatory language and emphasizes GHRD's claimed achievements without critical assessment.

5. Conflict of interest: The depth of insider knowledge suggests this may have been written by someone affiliated with GHRD, without proper disclosure.

I propose that this article be tagged with

and

templates. It requires significant revision to meet Wikipedia's standards for neutrality and verifiability. Independent, reliable sources should be added, promotional language removed, and a more balanced perspective presented.

If no improvements are made, this article may need to be considered for deletion as promotional content. Thoughts from other editors would be appreciated. Adebayochidinma28 (talk) 22:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]