Talk:Glenn Robert Davis

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Wisconsin Mid‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Problems

This smells like a copyvio, possibly from the book mentioned as a source. A google test doesn't turn up anything, so the next step would be for someone to check the book mentioned, and report here what they find. In any case, the article needs toning down of the POV promotional style. However, it's good to have an article on the Congressman. JesseW 01:05, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[This is the original poster]: I used the book to fill in the spots that I could not remember off hand and as a general outline, so I do not forget certain events. I only lived during the last 7-8 years of his life, after all. However, I do believe I susbstantially differated from the book in a manner that no 5 simultaneous words copy the text save by accident (which is my understanding as to what constitutes a copyright violation). Furthermore, his estate commissioned the book, something which I am a beneficiary of (muddling the legal waters, but in favor of non-violation). And finally, the major areas I copied verbatim would include names and dates, which would not be a copyright violation. Oh, and of course I was one of the sources for the book itself! If someone wants to change the format or language that is fine, but I'm not about to downplay one of our greatest American legends (at least, locally). There is a copy of the book in the Library of Congress, if anyone wants to check it out. Any questions or concerns I'll try and watch this page. Thanks. Love Wiki.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glenn Robert Davis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130120062708/http://waukeshacounty.gov/Courts.aspx?id=21144 to http://www.waukeshacounty.gov/Courts.aspx?id=21144

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]