Talk:Giving You the Best That I Got (album)
Appearance
The contents of the Just Because (Anita Baker song) page were merged into Giving You the Best That I Got (album). For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
The contents of the Lead Me Into Love page were merged into Giving You the Best That I Got (album). For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge with Lead Me Into Love
[edit]There is a unanimous consensus to merge Lead Me Into Love into Giving You the Best That I Got (album). Cunard (talk) 04:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Even when the song might be notable, shall the "Lead Me into Love" page be merged into the album page? George Ho (talk) 09:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Based on the current state of the song article I'd support a merger, though it's possible the article could be expanded to the point that I'd feel otherwise. DonIago (talk) 04:56, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- Makes sense to merge. Netherzone (talk) 20:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- I support a merge. Meatsgains (talk) 16:08, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Proposed merge with Just Because (Anita Baker song)
[edit]The article was nominated for deletion; the result was "no consensus". Even when the song may be "notable", the song article has not been tremendously expanded. The content was copied and pasted into the album page in case of potential merger, but the song article was not yet redirected to there. Shall the song article be merged, redirected, or what else? George Ho (talk) 19:16, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Seems like an obvious redirect candidate to me. Nothing will be lost since the content has been carried over already. If additional information is added later (like the book source mentioned in the deletion discussion), it can always be split back out. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)