Talk:Giuliana Rancic

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Laurenmanore (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Photo

Is she known for that presumably life-threatening left-upper-thoracic tumor, or do need a more representative pic?
--Jerzy•t 04:14, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

poor woman, feel so sorry for what happened to her. Sorry for her husband too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.231.255.242 (talk) 11:34, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

E! show

Why isn't there a mention of her show Giuliana and Bill? -Phoenixrod (talk) 03:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Last name

DePandi is not an acceptable last name according to Italian register office. It's either De Pandi or Depandi, since CamelCase is not legally accepted. --2.33.22.163 (talk) 15:52, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another famous Neapolitan Beauty

Does she not bear an unmistakeable resemblance to another famous Neapolitan beauty, Sophia Loren? hgwb (talk) 05:50, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article does not fit standards

"Since she was made anchor in 2005, viewership for "E! News" has risen over 50% across the board" What is this in reference to and what is the timeframe? Can I get a specific source for this? Why does this article feel so fluffy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.187.76.106 (talk) 18:07, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giuliana Rancic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Replaced archive link http://liveweb.archive.org/http://scoop.today.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/12/05/9221432-giuliana-rancic-to-have-double-mastectomy?chromedomain=entertainment with https://web.archive.org/web/20111205224605/http://scoop.today.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/12/05/9221432-giuliana-rancic-to-have-double-mastectomy?chromedomain=entertainment on http://scoop.today.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/12/05/9221432-giuliana-rancic-to-have-double-mastectomy?chromedomain=entertainment

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]